Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 199
Filtrar
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 31(9): 1633-1644, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32206852

RESUMEN

PLHIV have an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures when compared with people of the same age and sex. In this review, we address the epidemiology and the pathophysiology of bone disease and fractures in PLHIV. The assessment of fracture risk and fracture prevention in these subjects is also discussed. The spectrum of HIV-associated disease has changed dramatically since the introduction of potent antiretroviral drugs. Today, the survival of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is close to that of the general population. However, the longer life-span in PLHIV is accompanied by an increased prevalence of chronic diseases. Detrimental effects on bone health are well recognised, with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures, including vertebral fractures, compared to the general population. The causes of bone disease in PLHIV are not fully understood, but include HIV-specific risk factors such as use of antiretrovirals and the presence of chronic inflammation, as well as traditional risk factors for fracture. Current guidelines recommend the use of FRAX to assess fracture probability in PLHIV age ≥ 40 years and measurement of bone mineral density in those at increased fracture risk. Vitamin D deficiency, if present, should be treated. Bisphosphonates have been shown to increase bone density in PLHIV although fracture outcomes are not available.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Infecciones por VIH , Osteoporosis , Adulto , Densidad Ósea , Difosfonatos , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(12): 3495-3500, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28861636

RESUMEN

In this study, we report that self-perception of fracture risk captures some aspect of fracture risk not currently measured using conventional fracture prediction tools and is associated with improved medication uptake. It suggests that adequate appreciation of fracture risk may be beneficial and lead to greater healthcare engagement and treatment. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess how well self-perception of fracture risk, and fracture risk as estimated by the fracture prediction tool FRAX, related to fracture incidence and uptake and persistence of anti-osteoporosis medication among women participating in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). METHODS: GLOW is an international cohort study involving 723 physician practices across 10 countries in Europe, North America and Australia. Aged ≥ 55 years, 60,393 women completed baseline questionnaires detailing medical history, including co-morbidities, fractures and self-perceived fracture risk (SPR). Annual follow-up included self-reported incident fractures and anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) use. We calculated FRAX risk without bone mineral density measurement. RESULTS: Of the 39,241 women with at least 1 year of follow-up data, 2132 (5.4%) sustained an incident major osteoporotic fracture over 5 years of follow-up. Within each SPR category, risk of fracture increased as the FRAX categorisation of risk increased. In GLOW, only 11% of women with a lower baseline SPR were taking AOM at baseline, compared with 46% of women with a higher SPR. AOM use tended to increase in the years after a reported fracture. However, women with a lower SPR who were fractured still reported lower AOM rates than women with or without a fracture but had a higher SPR. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that SPR captures some aspect of fracture risk not currently measured using conventional fracture prediction tools and is also associated with improved medication uptake.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Autoimagen , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/psicología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 25(1): 85-95, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23884437

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Accurate patient risk perception of adverse health events promotes greater autonomy over, and motivation towards, health-related lifestyles. INTRODUCTION: We compared self-perceived fracture risk and 3-year incident fracture rates in postmenopausal women with a range of morbidities in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). METHODS: GLOW is an international cohort study involving 723 physician practices across ten countries (Europe, North America, Australasia); 60,393 women aged ≥55 years completed baseline questionnaires detailing medical history and self-perceived fracture risk. Annual follow-up determined self-reported incident fractures. RESULTS: In total 2,945/43,832 (6.8%) sustained an incident fracture over 3 years. All morbidities were associated with increased fracture rates, particularly Parkinson's disease (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.89; 2.78-5.44), multiple sclerosis (2.70; 1.90-3.83), cerebrovascular events (2.02; 1.67-2.46), and rheumatoid arthritis (2.15; 1.53-3.04) (all p < 0.001). Most individuals perceived their fracture risk as similar to (46%) or lower than (36%) women of the same age. While increased self-perceived fracture risk was strongly associated with incident fracture rates, only 29% experiencing a fracture perceived their risk as increased. Under-appreciation of fracture risk occurred for all morbidities, including neurological disease, where women with low self-perceived fracture risk had a fracture HR 2.39 (CI 1.74-3.29) compared with women without morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women with morbidities tend to under-appreciate their risk, including in the context of neurological diseases, where fracture rates were highest in this cohort. This has important implications for health education, particularly among women with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, or cerebrovascular disease.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/psicología , Autoimagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estilo de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/psicología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/psicología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Medición de Riesgo
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 24(1): 59-67, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22525976

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We evaluated healthcare utilization associated with treating fracture types in >51,000 women aged ≥55 years. Over the course of 1 year, there were five times more non-hip, non-spine fractures than hip or spine fractures, resulting in twice as many days of hospitalization and rehabilitation/nursing home care for non-hip, non-spine fractures. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate medical healthcare utilization associated with treating several types of fractures in women ≥55 years from various geographic regions. METHODS: Information from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) was collected via self-administered patient questionnaires at baseline and year 1 (n = 51,491). Self-reported clinically recognized low-trauma fractures at year 1 were classified as incident spine, hip, wrist/hand, arm/shoulder, pelvis, rib, leg, and other fractures. Healthcare utilization data were self-reported and included whether the fracture was treated at a doctor's office/clinic or at a hospital. Patients were asked if they had undergone surgery or been treated at a rehabilitation center or nursing home. RESULTS: During 1-year follow-up, there were 195 spine, 134 hip, and 1,654 non-hip, non-spine fractures. Clinical vertebral fractures resulted in 617 days of hospitalization and 512 days of rehabilitation/nursing home care; hip fractures accounted for 1,306 days of hospitalization and 1,650 days of rehabilitation/nursing home care. Non-hip, non-spine fractures resulted in 3,805 days in hospital and 5,186 days of rehabilitation/nursing home care. CONCLUSIONS: While hip and vertebral fractures are well recognized for their associated increase in health resource utilization, non-hip, non-spine fractures, by virtue of their 5-fold greater number, require significantly more healthcare resources.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/terapia , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/rehabilitación , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/terapia , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia
5.
Arch Osteoporos ; 7: 25-30, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23225278

RESUMEN

The use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of medical disorders can lead to rapid bone loss and increased risk of fragility fracture. Updated clinical guidelines are needed that accommodate recent advances in fracture risk assessment and new pharmacological interventions to reduce fracture risk. This document serves as an appendix to the 2012 IOF-ECTS guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Osteoporosis/prevención & control
6.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(12): 2769-74, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22836278

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Guidelines concerning the definition of failure of therapies used to reduce the risk of fracture are provided. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to provide guidelines concerning the definition of failure of therapies used to reduce the risk of fracture. METHODS: A working group of the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation was convened to define outcome variables that may assist clinicians in decision making. RESULTS: In the face of limited evidence, failure of treatment may be inferred when two or more incident fractures have occurred during treatment, when serial measurements of bone remodelling markers are not suppressed by anti-resorptive therapy and where bone mineral density continues to decrease. CONCLUSION: The provision of pragmatic criteria to define failure to respond to treatment provides an unmet clinical need and may stimulate research into an important issue.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Biomarcadores/sangre , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Osteoporosis/sangre , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/sangre , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(12): 2863-71, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22398855

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Among 50,461 postmenopausal women, 1,822 fractures occurred (57% minor non-hip, non-vertebral [NHNV], 26% major NHNV, 10% spine, 7% hip) over 1 year. Spine fractures had the greatest detrimental effect on EQ-5D, followed by major NHNV and hip fractures. Decreases in physical function and health status were greatest for spine or hip fractures. INTRODUCTION: There is growing evidence that NHNV fractures result in substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of these NHNV fractures on quality of life. METHODS: We analyzed the 1-year incidences of hip, spine, major NHNV (pelvis/leg, shoulder/arm) and minor NHNV (wrist/hand, ankle/foot, rib/clavicle) fractures among women from the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was analyzed using the EuroQol EQ-5D tool and the SF-36 health survey. RESULTS: Among 50,461 women analyzed, there were 1,822 fractures (57% minor NHNV, 26% major NHNV, 10% spine, 7% hip) over 1 year. Spine fractures had the greatest detrimental effect on EQ-5D summary scores, followed by major NHNV and hip fractures. The number of women with mobility problems increased most for those with major NHNV and spine fractures (both +8%); spine fractures were associated with the largest increases in problems with self care (+11%), activities (+14%), and pain/discomfort (+12%). Decreases in physical function and health status were greatest for those with spine or hip fractures. Multivariable modeling found that EQ-5D reduction was greatest for spine fractures, followed by hip and major/minor NHNV. Statistically significant reductions in SF-36 physical function were found for spine fractures, and were borderline significant for major NHNV fractures. CONCLUSION: This prospective study shows that NHNV fractures have a detrimental effect on HRQL. Efforts to optimize the care of osteoporosis patients should include the prevention of NHNV fractures.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/rehabilitación , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/etiología , Fracturas de Cadera/rehabilitación , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/psicología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/rehabilitación
8.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(9): 2257-76, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22434203

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: This paper provides a framework for the development of national guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women aged 18 years and over in whom oral glucocorticoid therapy is considered for 3 months or longer. INTRODUCTION: The need for updated guidelines for Europe and other parts of the world was recognised by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society, which set up a joint Guideline Working Group at the end of 2010. METHODS AND RESULTS: The epidemiology of GIO is reviewed. Assessment of risk used a fracture probability-based approach, and intervention thresholds were based on 10-year probabilities using FRAX. The efficacy of intervention was assessed by a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Guidance for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is updated in the light of new treatments and methods of assessment. National guidelines derived from this resource need to be tailored within the national healthcare framework of each country.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(8): 2179-88, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22086311

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We examined variations in proportions of hip fractures and major fractures among postmenopausal women using the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). The proportion of major fractures that were hip fractures varied with age and region, whereas variations in the proportion of fractures that were major fractures appeared modest. INTRODUCTION: In many countries, the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool calculates the probability of major fractures by assuming a uniform age-associated proportion of major fractures that are hip fractures in different countries. We further explored this assumption, using data from the GLOW. METHODS: GLOW is an observational population-based study of 60,393 non-institutionalized women aged ≥55 years who had visited practices within the previous 2 years. Main outcome measures were self-reported prevalent fractures after the age of 45 years and incident fractures during the 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The adjusted proportion of prevalent and incident major fractures after the age of 45 years that were hip fractures was higher in North America (16%, 17%) than in northern (13%, 12%) and southern Europe (10%, 10%), respectively. The proportion of incident major fractures that were hip fractures increased more than five-fold with age, from 6.6% among 55-59-year-olds to 34% among those aged ≥85 years. Regional and age-associated variations in the proportion of all incident fractures that were major fractures were less marked, not exceeding 16% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that there may be regional differences in the proportion of major fractures that are hip fractures in postmenopausal women. In contrast, the regional and age-related variations in the proportion of fractures that are major fractures appear to be modest. However, because of the limited number of fractures in our sample, further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Osteoporos Int ; 22(9): 2395-411, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21779818

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The introduction of the WHO FRAX® algorithms has facilitated the assessment of fracture risk on the basis of fracture probability. Its use in fracture risk prediction has strengths, but also limitations of which the clinician should be aware and are the focus of this review INTRODUCTION: The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) appointed a joint Task Force to develop resource documents in order to make recommendations on how to improve FRAX and better inform clinicians who use FRAX. The Task Force met in November 2010 for 3 days to discuss these topics which form the focus of this review. METHODS: This study reviews the resource documents and joint position statements of ISCD and IOF. RESULTS: Details on the clinical risk factors currently used in FRAX are provided, and the reasons for the exclusion of others are provided. Recommendations are made for the development of surrogate models where country-specific FRAX models are not available. CONCLUSIONS: The wish list of clinicians for the modulation of FRAX is large, but in many instances, these wishes cannot presently be fulfilled; however, an explanation and understanding of the reasons may be helpful in translating the information provided by FRAX into clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Modelos Estadísticos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Salud Global , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Organización Mundial de la Salud
12.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 96(8): 2414-21, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21677038

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: A high prevalence of obesity has recently been reported in postmenopausal women with low trauma fracture, suggesting that higher bone mineral density (BMD) in obese individuals may not be protective against fracture. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare BMD and other risk factors for nonvertebral fracture in 1377 obese postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Characteristics of obese women with and without incident nonvertebral fracture were investigated among the prospective cohort in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. SETTING: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures is a multicenter study of 9704 women (>99% Caucasian) aged 65 yr and over who were recruited between September 1986 and October 1988 from population-based listings at four U.S. clinical centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was nonvertebral fracture. RESULTS: BMD T-scores in the spine, femoral neck, and total hip were significantly lower in obese women who experienced fractures than in obese women without fracture: mean differences, -0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.73 to -0.39], -0.46 (95% CI = -0.57 to -0.36), and -0.51 (95% CI = -0.62 to -0.39), respectively (P < 0.0001 for all). A previous history of fracture [odds ratio = 1.69 (95% CI = 1.33-2.14); P < 0.0001] and femoral neck BMD [1.62 (95% CI = 1.42-1.85) per sd decrease in BMD; P < 0.0001] were independently associated with incident nonvertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Obese postmenopausal women who sustain nonvertebral fractures have significantly lower BMD on average than obese women without fracture and are more likely to have a past history of fracture. Fractures in obese postmenopausal women thus exhibit some characteristics of fragility fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Muñeca/epidemiología , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
J Anat ; 218(5): 510-6, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21355867

RESUMEN

Although age-related changes in cancellous bone structure in human are relatively well characterized, few studies have addressed changes in cortical bone. We have investigated age-related changes in iliac crest bone biopsy specimens from 54 normal subjects, 23 men and 31 women, aged 18-90 years. A significant decrease in cortical width and area was seen (P =0.002 and <0.001 respectively), with no difference between sexes. Haversian canal density increased significantly with age by approximately 9% per decade (P = 0.032) but Haversian canal area tended to be lower, resulting in no overall age-related difference in cortical porosity. Haversian canal area was significantly higher in the endosteal section than in the periosteal section of the cortex (P = 0.019) but the Haversian canal density was lower, resulting in similar overall porosity in the two sections. In conclusion, our results demonstrate an age-related decrease in iliac crest cortical width in men and women and an increase in Haversian canal density, but no overall change in cortical porosity.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Densidad Ósea , Ilion/patología , Ilion/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
14.
QJM ; 104(7): 599-606, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21385830

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High rates of fracture following liver transplantation were reported in earlier years, but the impact of subsequent changes in immune suppression and the introduction of bone-protective therapy on fracture rate have not been reported. AIM: The aim of this study was to document clinical fracture incidence during the period 1998-2008 in a single transplant centre, following the introduction of a bone management protocol. DESIGN: It was designed as a retrospective cohort. METHODS: Records were retrieved from 531 of 592 eligible patients in an audit of all patients undergoing a first liver transplant during the 10-year period. All fractures were verified radiologically. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 61.4 months. Prior to transplantation 5.6% of patients had a history of fracture. Incident clinical fractures following transplantation were recorded in just 15 (3.5%) patients. The most common fracture site was the spine and the median time from transplant to fracture was 26 months (range 2-83 months). CONCLUSION: There was a low fracture rate in patients undergoing liver transplantation in this centre over the past 10 years. This rate is lower than that in previous reports, which is likely to reflect the use of lower doses of prednisolone for immune suppression and the administration of bone-protective therapy to high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Adulto , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Auditoría Clínica , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Osteoporos Int ; 22(9): 2557-60, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20936399

RESUMEN

We describe the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with a metatarsal fracture and was found to have a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of +11 in the lumbar spine and +7.6 in the hip. Subsequent investigation revealed very high serum, urine and tissue fluoride levels, associated with excessive tea and toothpaste consumption. The case emphasises the need to exclude fluorosis in individuals with unexpectedly high BMD levels.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Intoxicación por Flúor/etiología , Fluoruros/administración & dosificación , Té/envenenamiento , Pastas de Dientes/envenenamiento , Femenino , Intoxicación por Flúor/diagnóstico , Fluoruros/química , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pastas de Dientes/administración & dosificación
16.
Osteoporos Int ; 22(1): 27-35, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20358360

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We compared self-perception of fracture risk with actual risk among 60,393 postmenopausal women aged ≥55 years, using data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Most postmenopausal women with risk factors failed to appreciate their actual risk for fracture. Improved education about osteoporosis risk factors is needed. INTRODUCTION: This study seeks to compare self-perception of fracture risk with actual risk among postmenopausal women using data from GLOW. METHODS: GLOW is an international, observational, cohort study involving 723 physician practices in 17 sites in ten countries in Europe, North America, and Australia. Participants included 60,393 women ≥55 years attended by their physician during the previous 24 months. The sample was enriched so that two thirds were ≥65 years. Baseline surveys were mailed October 2006 to February 2008. Main outcome measures were self-perception of fracture risk in women with elevated risk vs women of the same age and frequency of risk factors for fragility fracture. RESULTS: In the overall study population, 19% (10,951/58,434) of women rated their risk of fracture as a little/much higher than that of women of the same age; 46% (27,138/58,434) said it was similar; 35% (20,345/58,434) believed it to be a little/much lower. Among women whose actual risk was increased based on the presence of any one of seven risk factors for fracture, the proportion who recognized their increased risk ranged from 19% for smokers to 39% for current users of glucocorticoid medication. Only 33% (4,185/12,612) of those with ≥2 risk factors perceived themselves as being at higher risk. Among women reporting a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis, only 25% and 43%, respectively, thought their risk was increased. CONCLUSION: In this international, observational study, most postmenopausal women with risk factors failed to appreciate their actual risk for fracture.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/psicología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...